In yet another case, Courts have limited an individual’s rights in private or confidential communications just because they use a work computer or work provided email account.
The California Court expresses this point in no uncertain terms:
Continue Reading →“…e-mails sent by Holmes to her attorney regarding possible legal action against defendants did not constitute “„confidential communication between client and lawyer‟” within the meaning of Evidence Code section 952. This is so because Holmes used a computer of defendant company to send the e-mails even though (1) she ...
30
APR
2011
APR
2011
0
Share